ShareShare
Text size Increase font sizeDecrease font size

iconBook

Case Study Method

Roger Gomm & Martyn Hammersley & Peter Foster

Pub. date: 2009 | DOI:10.4135/9780857024367

Print ISBN: 9780761964148 | Online ISBN: 9780857024367

Book Chapter

10 SMALL N'S AND BIG CONCLUSIONS: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases

Stanley Lieberson

This chapter evaluates an approach which is gaining in usage, especially for historical and comparative problems. Namely, we will consider the causal inferences drawn when little more than a handful of nations or organizations - sometimes even fewer - are compared with respect to the forces driving a societal outcome such as a political development or an organizational characteristic.1 Application of this method to a small number of cases is not new to sociology, being in one form or another a variant of the method of analytic induction, described by Znaniecki (1934, p. 236) and analysed succinctly by Robinson (1951) and Turner (1953) [see Chapters 8 and 9 - respectively Editors’ Note].2 These conclusions rely on a formalized internal logic derived from Mill's method of agreement and his method of difference (see the discussion of Mill in Nichols, 1986, pp. 170ff.). The formal rigour...

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please, subscribe or login to access all Methods content.

Click here to see full text

Articles in SAGE Journals by