Share Share
Text size Increase font size Decrease font size

iconEncyclopedia

The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods

Michael S. Lewis-Beck & Alan Bryman & Tim Futing Liao

Pub. date: 2004 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412950589

Print ISBN: 9780761923633 | Online ISBN: 9781412950589

Share Share
Text size Increase font size Decrease font size

Encyclopedia Entry

Generalization/Generalizability in Qualitative Research

Malcolm Williams

The issue of whether one should or can generalize from the findings of qualitative (interpretive/ethnographic) research lies at the heart of the approach, although it is discussed less than one would expect. Its relative absence from the methodological literature is likely attributable to it being seen by many qualitative researchers as a preoccupation of those who take a NOMOTHETIC , specifically quantitative, approach to research. For many qualitative researchers, it is a nonissue because the role of qualitative research is to interpret the meanings of agents within particular social contexts, rather than measuring, explaining, or predicting. Those who deny the possibility of generalization argue that individual consciousnesses are free to attach different meanings to the same actions or circumstances. Conversely, different actions can arise ...

Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content on this page. Please, subscribe or login to access all Methods content.

Click here to see full text

Articles in Google Scholar by